Declaring information Independence Day

June 19th, 2008

By John F. Allen

I’m sure that at times you have balled up your local newspaper and thrown it in the trash because of some marxist propaganda piece on its editorial page. Like you I had thought about canceling the leftist anti American hate sheet that the paperboy drops on your lawn each morning but found it hard to break an old bad habit. I found that thinking about it and actually doing it were two different things. I have finally canceled my subscription and I fell much cleaner. Do likewise and so will you.

My friends the time has come to act. Think about how contradictory it is to pay to have your local fish wrap delivered each day so it can infect your children with its lies and insults to your way of life.

A few months back my local POS, the Staten Island Advance helped me reach my own breaking point with a Sunday
op-ed piece calling for the impeachment of both President Bush and Vice President Cheney. The text meant nothing to me, but the accompanying pictures did. There were common criminal arrest style side and front view pictures of both men.
That did it for me and I canceled my subscription. I am now information Independent. I suggest that this July 4th everyone does the same: cancel cancel cancel! The marxist rag papers are wobbling anyway. Let’s kick them in the shins and finish them off.

March 28th, 2008

Could sexual addiction end Governor David Paterson’s career?

By Irene Reznick

According to established theory, sex addiction is very real.
Social scientists agree that sexual addicts act in a compulsive manner without regard for the risks involved as they hunt for sexual experiences. Neither their station in life, nor the possible damage to their family means anything to the prowling sex addict. So if family considerations mean little to the addict, laws and other social conventions mean still less.
David Paterson shows some of the signs of sexual addiction, but he has no history with prostitutes. Such “walks on the wild side” were done by Eliot Spitzer, but not Paterson.

Paterson admits to “sporadic” sexual meetings with a limited number of women. This does not seem likely. As a Democratic New York State Senator, life for Mr. Paterson was very boring. The Republicans have held the Senate since before living memory and thus it has always been a one way ticket to obscurity for a Democrat. Idle hands are the devils workshop, it is said.

Among other hallmarks of sexually addicted behavior, we find anonymous sex with many partners. We can rule that out because David Paterson is blind. While he would have had the time and the boredom to search out anonymous sex, the logistics involved with a blind Black man connecting with multiple anonymous partners just doesn’t wash.

No, he would need willing female partners, those who would drive him places. He said he was separated from his wife. Was he therefore involved in a “stable” relationship or two over the years? Serial relationships cut down on logistical problems so they make sense when considering the sexual history of a bored and separated politician. If this is the case it will mean nothing, but if one of these relationships produced a child the roof will blow off his governorship.

Richardson endorsement helping Obama in New Mexico? Think again.

March 26th, 2008

By Irene Reznick

In 2004 we at Catholics Against Kerry, beat John Kerry in New Mexico and Governor Bill Richardson could not lie his way out of his humiliation. It was great fun watching him shuck and jive about “the final results not coming in from the reservation yet.” He was talking about the Navajo reservation.

We laughed at his stammering surprise when the numbers did come in. One thing we understood, that the Democrats and the media still do not get, is that America’s Indians are almost totally pro life. They don’t want the White man to trick their women into killing off the last remaining members of their tribes.

Using radio ads in English, Spanish and Navajo in McKinley County where the reservation is, we explained George Bush was pro life, and John Kerry was the abortion candidate. It was heart warming to listen to the spot in Navajo. Naturally we could not understand a word in their language, but we were awe struck when we heard the words “partial birth abortion” in the middle of the text.

Our New Mexico chapter had to use the English wording because “abortion” does not exist in the Navajo language. Being a “backwards people” the Navajo do not understand killing unborn babies as the Park Avenue liberals do. Bush lost New Mexico by under 400 votes in 2000. He won by about 9000 votes in 2006. That was just the number of votes he won by on the reservation.

Richardson may be able to sell Barack Obama to the Hispanics in his state, if he is the VP on the ticket, which is doubtful, but when the Navajo hear of Obama’s efforts to euthanize inconvenient born babies, his campaign in the Land of Enchantment will be as dead the babies he tried to murder.

How Obama’s dominos will fall: The coming McCain landslide victory

March 24th, 2008

How Obama’s dominos will fall: The coming McCain landslide victory

by John F. Allen

Liberal wishful thinking aside, McCain will win in a landslide.

White men, White Democrats and probably disaffected White women will not vote for Obama. It is very unlikely Hispanics, who have worked hard to become top minority in America, will vote to make a Black man the President.

These points hurt and burn a hole in the head of liberals and the media, but look at these nettlesome numbers.

There was a chance Barack McGovern Obama could have won Virginia and Arkansas and improved his expected Electoral vote count to 270 EVs ( Kerry got 251 EVs). On paper this could have been a rather close election. Unfortunately for Obama, we don’t vote in newsrooms or DNC headquarters. We vote in the real world.

The fact that Whites won’t vote for Obama, combined with the other factors, puts several of the old Kerry 2004 states in his “unlikely column.”

Massachusetts, where they are already tied before the bradley factor is added 12 EVs.

Maine the Whitest state, 4

New Hampshire 94% White, lots of White liberals from Boston, 4

Connecticut – Lieberman + 75% White + 330,000 Hispanics, 7

New Jersey – Orthodox Jews promising not to vote Obama + 1.2 million Hispanics + 2 point lead NOW, 15.

Pennsylvania, 82% White, 500,000 Hispanics 21

Wisconsin 86% White, 295,000 Hispanics 10

Minnesota, Franken + 86% White, 9

This will move 65 Electoral Votes from Obama to McCain, for a 354 to 186 blow out.

States Obama should not have to campaign in, but will be forced to: California most Hispanic state 12 million, only 43% White but just 8% Black 55

Washington, 77% White, 15th most Hispanic and 3.5% Black. 11 EVs.

Oregon White 81%, Black 2% Hispanic rank 18Th, 7

This election could be over about half past October.

How Obama’s dominos will far: The coming McCain landslide victory

March 24th, 2008

How Obama’s dominos will far: The coming McCain landslide victory

by John F. Allen

Liberal wishful thinking aside, McCain will win in a landslide.

White men, White Democrats and probably disaffected White women will not vote for Obama. It is very unlikely Hispanics, who have worked hard to become top minority in America, will vote to make a Black man the President.

These points hurt and burn a hole in the head of liberals and the media, but look at these nettlesome numbers.

There was a chance Barack McGovern Obama could have won Virginia and Arkansas and improved his expected Electoral vote count to 270 EVs ( Kerry got 251 EVs). On paper this could have been a rather close election. Unfortunately for Obama, we don’t vote in newsrooms or DNC headquarters. We vote in the real world.

The fact that Whites won’t vote for Obama, combined with the other factors, puts several of the old Kerry 2004 states in his “unlikely column.”

Massachusetts, where they are already tied before the bradley factor is added 12 EVs.

Maine the Whitest state, 4

New Hampshire 94% White, lots of White liberals from Boston, 4

Connecticut – Lieberman + 75% White + 330,000 Hispanics, 7

New Jersey – Orthodox Jews promising not to vote Obama + 1.2 million Hispanics + 2 point lead NOW, 15.

Pennsylvania, 82% White, 500,000 Hispanics 21

Wisconsin 86% White, 295,000 Hispanics 10

Minnesota, Franken + 86% White, 9

This will move 65 Electoral Votes from Obama to McCain, for a 354 to 186 blow out.

States Obama should not have to campaign in, but will be forced to: California most Hispanic state 12 million, only 43% White but just 8% Black 55

Washington, 77% White, 15th most Hispanic and 3.5% Black. 11 EVs.

Oregon White 81%, Black 2% Hispanic rank 18Th, 7

This election could be over about half past October.

Obama’s speech: fish rot from the head down

March 19th, 2008

By John F. Allen

Barack McGovern Obama is in trouble. He has been caught up in his own press clippings and now seems to be like a child trying out his lying skills on his parents. His speech, in which he tried to defend and explain the racist anti America sermons he has listened to from his pastor, was a true paradox. On one hand he was quite eloquent but on the other, the premise of his speech was ridiculous. It was like listening to a fifteen year old deliver Shakespeare very well, but spoil the moment by insisting he wrote it all himself.

The senator from Illinois, who was catapulted to his position by a series of fortunate turns of events, never was anything more than a con man selling himself as an authentic Black victim of White racism while he lived in Hawaii and went to the finest schools in “racist” America.

He is half White and half Black so in the corrupt world of Chicago politics, that means taking money from a White criminal during the week and attending services at a classic “hate Whitey” Black church on Sunday. If he had kept his head down and stayed in Chicago, he would never have been unmasked. But he did not, and now he has been found out.

His words will not be long remembered, but there meaning will be. No one who was not voting for him had an epiphany at his words and has now switched to being a devoted fan. Not in this lifetime.

The heartland will remember only that he tried to establish a moral equivalence between the hate preached in his church and the love taught in true Christian churches. Heartland America will not forget and was not swayed.

Rush it’s time to adjust our strategy and back Obama

March 17th, 2008

By John F. Allen

The Democrat’s Volvo is rolling over the cliff of phony liberal piety. Now the lies establishment liberals have told about themselves are open for the world to see. Their putative open mindedness, their affinity for the underdog and their willingness to personally sacrifice their own comfort for social progress is giving way to a no holds barred fight against “one of them.”

The “one of them” is Barack Hussein Obama, who is Black with a Muslim name and the most liberal senator in America.

The number of flaws Mr. Obama brings to his candidacy for President of the United States are such that if he was Barry Henry Oswald, White Presbyterian Minister’s son, he might not be a Senator, let alone a contender for the Democrat nomination. Nevertheless, the flaws are there and they are important and Senator Obama is about to win his party’s nomination.

Rush, your strategy has worked very well. There is now no doubt that Mrs. Clinton has been helped by your efforts, but any further work for her might be counter productive. She has been helped enough so she will be a player to the end. She is a Clinton so she will not follow Romney and leave for the good of her party. Accordingly, it is now time to start supporting Obama so we make sure he wins.

We no longer have to make believe that he would be the tougher opponent. Neither would be, but he is the weaker. The fate of the Democrats is sealed. Let’s help Obama nail this down. He will after all be Barack McGovern Obama when this is over.
Now we should start working to get our side a huge win so we can change McCain for the better. Supporting Obama is the way to that landslide.

Eliot Spitzer Stool pigeon: singing about Democrat campaign finance crimes?

March 14th, 2008

By John F. Allen

Republicans commit campaign finance crimes, but the Democrats really do own the crime of looting campaign treasuries.

Now that the FBI has dropped the hammer on Eliot Spitzer a process has started, he tries to bargain his way out of going to prison and they listen. Yet, therein lays the problem for Spitzer: The Feds have already listened to Spitzer for nine months. They KNOW everything he did. They KNOW about his hooker related crimes and his money laundering. This means there is nothing in the hooker area that he can trade. They probably know way more than he does. He will have to tell them something, but what? This leads us to the crime the Democrats own the pattern on: campaign finance money stealing.

Spitzer will HAVE to talk about campaign finance crimes: it’s all he has left to trade. As a New York Democrat, he knows about his own campaign finance crimes and those of other Democrats. When you enter into a plea agreement in Federal Court you must not only admit to the current crime, but also every other crime you have been involved in whether the government knew about that crime or not. You lie, deal dies and you go to prison.

Eliot Spitzer is nothing if not a pampered little punk who does not have the guts to face prison. His lawyer wife will force him to roll on everyone he ever did a campaign crime with. He knows where the bodies are buried and he will sing like a bird.

Because New York Democrats never have tough elections, they never get researched. This leads them to believe they never will face an honest examination of their crimes. They get sloppy which makes them easy prey. They will get caught. This is just the beginning.

Barack McGovern Obama? It’s up to you

March 12th, 2008

By John F. Allen

Now that even Rush is speaking truthfully about the election, some inescapable facts need to be considered.

Forget Obama’s given middle name. It won’t be important. By Election Day everyone will think of his middle name as McGovern.

Barack McGovern Osama will lose by a wide margin for the following reasons:

* Twenty percent of White Democrats already ADMIT they will not vote for him (Pew).Moreover they say they WILL vote for McCain, a double hit.

*No one can win giving away 20% of his base.

* Forty three percent over all ADMIT they will not vote for him ( Rasmussen).

*Since 1964 no Democrat has won the White male vote. It is my opinion that he won’t bring them back nor will he do even as well as the last two losers who were White males.

* McCain is already plus 15 Tenn., 11 Florida and 2 New Jersey, inconvenient facts for the “experts” predicting a big Democrat win.

*Orthodox Jews, a very important group in New York, say they will not vote for him. Because of Spitzer, Obama will have to campaign in New York with a blind Black governor. This fact put New York in play no matter what anyone says.

Barack McGovern Osama’s campaign will be stillborn. He can only win is if those who should know better stay home or vote for him. They will be responsible for making America a socialist country and giving joy and aid to our terrorist Islamist enemies who will see an Obama win as a sign that we are surrendering.

Maybe it is time for the pious breast beaters to stop their promotion of the conservative movement over the safety and wellbeing of America. Rebuilding conservatism will be much easier than repairing the damage Barack McGovern Osama will do.

Putting Caliph Barack Blessing Osama’s numbers in perspective

March 3rd, 2008

Putting Caliph Barack Blessing Osama’s numbers in perspective

The media ignore this, but the Democrats are headed for reruns of 1972 and 1984. During both years they were euphoric about their chances.

In 1972 George McGovern was to be the final triumph of the left in its war against the war in Viet Nam. They thought had mainstreamed socialism “Power to the people! Comes to mind.”

Noted political morons like Jim Bouton, Warren Beatty, Dick Gregory, and Ron Kovic worked at the grassroots to sell socialism masked as peace and justice. Isn’t always?

McGovern took the worse beating in American history up to that point. Yet in spite of this humiliating defeat, McGovern still got 29 million votes. If one focuses on the raw number it is indeed impressive. That would have won many elections.

In 1984 Walter Mondale, an affable dunce from Minnesota, ran on an “I’ll raise your taxes pledge. It is said that he spoke to his largest crowds in the final days of the campaign. He spoke in 21 cities before crowds of up to 100,000

Seeing the crowds, he actually said, “There’s something stirring. …we’re going to win..”
Sound familiar?
Speaking to 7 million fawning women on Phil Donahue’s show, Geraldine Ferraro, Mondale’s running mate said “My candidacy is not just for me. It’s for everyone. It’s not just a symbol. It’s a breakthrough. It’s not just a statement. .. a bond between women all over America.” Mondale got 37 million votes 6 million more than Nixon won with in 1968, but lost worse than his socialist hero McGovern had.
Keep these facts in mind when the media how well Caliph Barack Hussein Obama’s campaign is going this summer. In Sept the “youth vote” dries up and the older people start using Mondale’s only memorable line, “Where’s the beef?” There won’t be any.