Collins Report

By Kevin “Coach” Collins

Pardon me if I don’t feel totally reassured Barack Obama’s Chicago gangsters have done nothing sleazy crooked and/or illegal in the Blagojevich case because The One says so. The facts beg the question: Who tells the biggest whoppers, Baghdad Barack or Baghdad Bob

The media’s handling of Obama’s self serving pronouncement of his staff’s innocence is sickening and additional proof they are in the tank for the Democrat Party.

Reading the “professionally reported” headlines above the stories about Obama’s self exoneration shows not a single one expressed even a little skepticism or doubt about the continued purity of The Messiah.

My favorite headline was “Obama team clears itself on Blagojevich”, but others deserve mention as well.

“Obama clears himself and staff in Blagojevich case.”

“Obama: Investigation clears his team in Blagojevich matter.”

Why of course! Why would we dare think otherwise?

The Seattle Times coverage was all of 157 words on the subject, apparently saying, “Hey, The Messiah said he’s innocent, that’s good enough for us!”

This demands comparisons with one of Saddam’s best known henchmen, his propaganda minister Mohammed Saeed al-Sahhaf, better known as “Baghdad Bob.” He was famous for telling boldfaced whoppers, in spite of overwhelming proof he was lying.

During the closing days of our liberation of Iraq, Baghdad Bob, told some whoppers that would make Baghdad Barack envious.

“Their infidels [Americans] are committing suicide by the hundreds on the gates of Baghdad. Be assured, Baghdad is safe, protected.”

“I blame Al-Jazeera – they are marketing for the Americans!”

Which whoppers are harder to believe? Baghdad Bob’s or Baghdad Barack’s?

Baghdad Bob’s lies were funny. No one in the media had to say he was lying. Baghdad Barack’s lies aren’t funny, but there is no one in the media who will say he is lying. BOHICA everyone!

This site has been ahead of the curve on this issue. Others are starting to say Barack Obama will be splashed with the mud of this scandal. How much mud remains to be seen, but it’s a good bet that he will limp into the White House because of this matter. We are seeing the Obama solid wall on this thing crumbling already. The number of times Rahm Emanuel had spoken to Blagojevich about Obama’s Senate seat is now up to 21 as reported today. Remember Emanuel is a loyal Chicago gangster. He would NOT go behind his Don’s back to talk with Blagojevich.

By Kevin “Coach” Collins

Rahm Emanuel is a liar, but is he a rogue? It’s hardly likely.

He’s one of Barack Obama’s bagmen. The answers to hard questions would settle the matter, but the Democrat controlled media won’t ask them. Emanuel doesn’t show himself in public except to snarl at feckless reports who recoil from his glare.

Revelations of federal wire taps confirm Emanuel spoke with Rod Blagojevich at least six times. It’s insulting to try to tell us they didn’t discuss the price Blagojevich was demanding for appointing Obama’s recommended successor in the Senate.

During the campaign the Democrat media talked about Sarah Palin being a rogue who could not be trusted. She wouldn’t help John McCain make believe he is a conservative. She was a rogue.

While Palin was a rogue, Emanuel is cautious, not roguish. When Special Prosecutor Patrick FitzGerald says Emanuel is not the subject of an investigation he is speaking strictly in legal terms. In terms of real life scandal Emanuel is up to his hips in mud.

Does anyone believe he acted as a rogue, strolled off The One’s reservation and went behind Obama’s back to negotiate a deal with Blagojevich? Being “Chicago way” crooked politicians he and Obama and Blagojevich understand each other very well. They know business is business. Emanuel is not a rogue. He was acting on clear orders from The One, his Chicago style mob boss.

It seems very possible that Emanuel won’t survive this scandal. He won’t go to jail. He might not be publicly disgraced, but he’ll have to either publicly or tacitly admit he went rogue. Since “rogues” don’t work at the top levels of party politics Rahm Emanuel’s future may be in doubt. What is not doubtful is his conduct. He didn’t act as a rouge. Chicago crooks don’t go rogue.

Those who think Obama will just walk away from this are wrong. No, we won’t see his name in the caption of a federal indictment, but he will be hurt for sure. Since unions are involved in this scandal our side should be able to use it to fight and maybe kill the union thug/Democrat scheme to unionize the whole country. We need about fifteen months before the issue will bleed into the next cycle. Let’s see how eager the so called “Blue dog” Democrats are to vote for card check after this plays out.

By Kevin “Coach” Collins

Democrat Illinois Governor Rod Blagojevich is a crook’s crook. Even by the gutter level standards of Chicago his guy is a lowlife. But more than that, he is a moron and possibly a blackmailer.

First the lowlife/moron part: obviously Blagojevich was a crook from just about day one which is why he was selected to run for governor. The bum is in office for three years and has been under investigation for half of that span. Since it takes a while to get an investigation going, he must have been spotted right away, like a shoplifter at Wal-Mart. Besides being a crook he is also a moron. As far back as early December 2007 published reports about his wife being under investigation hit the streets.

A Law school graduate, Blagojevich eventually worked as a Cook County Assistant State’s Attorney, a position at which he obviously learned nothing, especially nothing about wiretaps. This man is a crook and a moron of the classic crooked Chicago mold.

He had a year’s warning to shut up and stop implicating himself on telephones. But of course as a Chicago Democrat he believed he was untouchable. Had it not been for a Republican US Attorney he would have been.

Now for the possible blackmailer part: For the past two years the Chicago Tribune investigated Barack Obama over his connections to Tony Rezko. Nevertheless,, last month for the first time ever the Tribune endorsed a Democrat for president. Was this a blackmailing or a quid pro quo? Blagojevich’s wiretap caught him demanding the firing of an unfriendly editorial writer at the financially troubled Tribune while publicly threatening them with trouble getting funded.

There’s definitely more to the story of why the financially troubled Tribune would endorse a Democrat it knew was covered in Tony Rezko’s crap.

This is just the beginning of the unraveling of the fraud the 20% of conservatives put in office because they were soooooo much smarter than the rest of us. They joined the stupidest of the stupid to inflict another eight years of Clinton on us.

Those who think this will have no effect on Obama’s ability to govern, including Rush have to make a stronger case than they have so far.

There will be big trouble and this will take some of “The One’s” moral high ground. Blagojevich will NOT go down by himself. He will hand up everybody he can. Just one month ago Rezko’s sentencing was postponed. Why? He was told this was coming and asked if he wanted “in” once it went down. It looks like maybe he took the deal.